The Olympicon is here. No surprise there: thousands of tourists going mad with giant cowbells, predominantly naked, painted all manner of colours, engaging in giant snowball fights & screaming orgies of well-meant nationalism as they cheer on their sporting heros… it’s a massive gongshow, and despite the hiccups, the debt, and the security presence, I’m often moved to tears by the athletic accomplishments.
But in other news, the Olympicon has brought together the first TedX conference in Whistler. TED, which stands for Technology, Entertainment, Design, is a nonprofit organisation devoted to Ideas Worth Spreading. TED has created a distributed model for its talks (otherwise held in Oxford and Long Beach), disseminating localized and independent TED talks worldwide – hence TedX. With this in mind, the Whistler organisers have created a conference devoted to the question of “Tourism’s Place in a Sustainable World.” It’s a swank yet seriously devoted affair, held at the Whistler Media House (aka Whistler Public Library), with the Squamish Lil’Wat First Nations Cultural Centre Ambassadors and Mayor Ken Melamed opening the talks. I’m sitting here on blogger island, attempting to tweet, blog and keep track of the multiple screens of information, projections, and videos that make up this fast-paced set of presentations. (If you’re on twitter, you can read the archived event tweets with the hashtag #tedX .)
Of course the question of sustainable tourism is imperative to a destination resort such as Whistler. From rumours that the Peak 2 Peak gondola was built to ferry passengers above the lower slopes of Whistler Blackcomb, when climate change will bring warmer and wetter winters – leaving the lower mountains green and snowless – to the ongoing questions of backcountry management when ski touring (and sledding) has grown massively over the past few years, questions of sustainability dominate Whistler’s economic future. I was hoping that Whistler Watch would be present at TedX, for this ad hoc collective of Whistlerites was instrumental in successfully opposing the privatization of Whistler’s waste treatment plant in 2006. And it’s worth noting that Whistler still doesn’t have sewage treatment for its oldest residencies on the West side of Alta Lake. As G Cluer wrote in the Pique recently, “It appears that neither the government nor municipality have any money – or interest – to provide such an unexciting item [sewage line to Alta Lake]. The cost of a couple of fuel cell buses might have covered it” (Feb 3rd 2010).
Bruce Poon Tip, who runs Gap Adventures, described the differences between ecotourism, responsible tourism and sustainable tourism – kind of a mixed message lineage of the development of more environmentally-friendly travel. That said, while I applaud the many initiatives his company has taken (which are honourable – winning several awards for their charitable acts & sustainable tourism initiatives), the difficult truth to swallow is that tourism means oil consumption. There is currently no tourism imaginable without oil, and the future of tourism is also the future of a planet reaching and surpassing peak oil (as a few audience members have noted in today’s discussions). In response, several audience members have suggested that a focus upon regional travel and local adventure tourism – turning away from costly international travel – might be the way forward to environmental and economic sustainability.
Valerie Langer, founder of Friends of Clayoquot Sound, made the point that only 20% of the world’s forests remain, and that Clayoquot Sound itself is only 40% (or so) protected – and that such protection cannot be considered permanent until alternative employment is found for the members of the logging (and fishing) industries. In short, sustainability means not only conservation, but developing labour and economic alternatives. Such work means working with logging industries and the First Nations in redesigning policy and regulation of ecosystem-based management, such as in the case of the Great Bear Rainforest, which Langer says is a “beacon of hope” for such initiatives – and which needs to succeed as successful models are desperately needed for the world, a “model for sustainability.”
Wade Davis, National Geographic Explorer-in-Residence, ethnographer and author of the thought-provoking study of alternatives to Western civilization The Wayfinders (collected from the 2009 Massey lectures), reminds us that Whistler needs to assess where the wealth of its visitors came from. In short, tourism attracts a wealthy class, and though the method of tourism in Whistler or even getting to Whistler might be sustainable or eco-friendly, the source of tourist wealth is probably not. From this point, Davis let loose the associations & narratives of alternative eco-societies. He led the audience on a whirlwind tour of sustainable indigenous communities, from Australian Dreamtime to rituals in the Andes, where various ceremonies of the sacred connect the collective to the unity of the Earth. As Davis notes, in Australia, there is only the moment of the dreaming, with no signifiers for time, past, present or future in the language; while such a culture won’t “put a man on the moon,” it also wouldn’t result in the ecological catastrophe we are in today. In short, “Sustainability is not an anomaly. In most civilizations, it is the norm.” So, in summary, while sustainability in Whistler might be the topic of TedX, it will go nowhere without (a) extending sustainability to the BC hinterlands, and beyond, pursuing a sustainable planet and (b) without investigating who is coming to Whistler, and what corporations are behind them, we can do little to affect sustainable change until we change the practices of tourists traveling to Whistler, as well as what they do outside of Whistler.
This was not all .. Mark Angelo, Chair of the Rivers Institute at BCIT, gave an inspiring talk on global travel which opened the event and set the tone for this fast-paced, thoughtful yet invigorating afternoon. Now it is time to refresh the brain with beer. See TedXWhistler for archives of the talks and conversations.
END OF LIVE BLOG TRANSMISSION //.










jb
February 19, 2010
……predominantly naked tourists? Where do I sign up??
// tobias //
February 19, 2010
no kidding, eh? you don’t even need to sign up. just jump in the MuchMusic hot tub @ the GLC ..
Naomi Devine
February 21, 2010
Tobias,
Great post and it was wonderful to have you on “blogger island” as my colleague put it.
A couple of points from my perspective of the event (as one of the organizers and theme generator) – the theme was “Tourism’s Place in a Sustainable World”, which is quite large, however I was hoping for a more advanced discussion than “no oil = no tourism”. My comment isn’t aimed at your assessment here, but rather the very limited understanding and associations most people make when they hear tourism and sustainability in the same sentence.
In other words, the automatic assumption is that these fundamentally cannot coexist. in our current world, with its economic structures – of course not. But that was the point of the event – to imagine what tourism’s place is in a SUSTAINABLE world – not the current one, and how we get there. Does tourism have a place? Can it help us move to a sustainable future? Or are we just going to assume that it can’t?
Wade and I had a long discussion about this, and the point that came out was – Whistler, while a destination/home for those who benefit from the destruction of many of the places we love (ie the BC Hinterland), has a special responsibility to work towards answers on the sustainability front. Whistler is a product of our society, thereby inheriting certain limitations on change, but if we can’t do it here, where can we?
Thanks for your thoughts.
Naomi
// tobias //
February 22, 2010
hey Naomi, thanks for writing and for your comments, and thank you indeed for having me blog TedX…! Indeed, I would very much agree with you that with our current global economic structures (as you put it) sustainability and tourism cannot coexist.
Perhaps to imagine a sustainable world, as you suggest, we would also need to reimagine our current economic structures and not just tourism and sustainability. In short, in order to achieve sustainable tourism we need to envision an economic structure capable of sustainability — and then we’re talking the political economy of global economic upheaval, either in response to peak oil (catastrophe) or in response to massive social pressure (revolution).
I interpreted the audience’s concerns with peak oil as a concrete application of the conference’s theme. Whistler residents (and business etc) cannot think tourism without thinking through the energy systems required for global travel. To do so otherwise — well, we can imagine a sustainable world, yes, and then tourism, as you suggest, but that’s also kind of like imagining utopia, then asking what it’s like to have ice cream…. I think the more immediate question is what will happen to tourism given peak oil, and as others in the audience suggested (and as I echoed above) regional tourism will probably be the way to roll. That in itself is going to require a massive rethinking of what “tourism” means in a place like Whistler.
In short I think to really get into the nut of it, this kind of conference needs to open up the can of worms concerning massive economic change. Perhaps this should be the theme of the next TedX in Whistler — what kind of economic change is necessary to bring about sustainability?
Thinking about your conversation with Wade, if Whistler has a special responsibility to work towards answers concerning sustainability, it has so not by virtue of any kind of inherent special status, but because its entire economy relies upon tourism (and global tourism — as well as speculative property development, large scale international direct foreign investment, hedge funds, and other speculative capital investments that portfolios such as Fortress deal in). In short it is absolutely necessary for Whistler, as an economic region, to sort out questions of sustainability for its very survival. And if doing so requires questioning the very economic conditions in which today, sustainability is impossible, then imagining a new economic vision in which sustainability is the moderus operandi of exchange is perhaps the greatest responsibility Whistler can take up … for such social change won’t come from above, or elsewhere, but from local regions who either force economic change or face extinction. This will be Whistler’s greatest legacy, and will determine its monumental success, or its failure…
best/ tobias
EDIT: completed this thought after returning from the Nordic Team Sprint today….